The article emphasizes on the impact analysis using project schedule, This article is continuation of my previous article Title "PREPARING CLAIM FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (EOT)" (URL:https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=6226101373765449612#editor/target=post;postID=2758220319089207158;onPublishedMenu=publishedposts;onClosedMenu=publishedposts;postNum=0;src=postname ).
The data in the Figure-1 of Article "PREPARING CLAIM FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (EOT)" can be prepared with help of project management tool. (Same Figure is referred in this article as Figure-6).
.
The general steps are described with the help of an example baseline schedule.as below:
This article elaborates on how baseline schedule is helpful to identify and refer the delay events and the associated dependencies for the impact analysis. It has already been mentioned in my previous article that the approved baseline schedule is the pre-requisite for the claim preparation.
.
Steps to perform impact analysis using project schedule
The general steps are described with the help of an example baseline schedule.as below:
1. Open
the baseline schedule file that has been approved by the Engineer
Figure 1:
Baseline Schedule
2. In
the baseline schedule identify the tasks that have been delayed.
Sr.#
|
Activity Name
|
Activity ID
|
1
|
Provision of Test Servers by
Engineer
|
P2P1005
|
2
|
Deployment on Test Server
|
P2P1008
|
3. Identify
the depending activities which have the predecessors mentioned in Figure 2 Dependencies/Tasks that are delayed.
These activities are halted and have not been started yet.
Sr.#
|
Activity Name
|
Activity ID
|
1
|
P2P Test of Module A
|
P2P1010
|
2
|
P2P Test of Module B
|
P2P1020
|
3
|
P2P Test of Module C
|
P2P1030
|
4. For
each activity identified in Figure 3 perform the following:
a. Set
the primary constraint of start date to the date when dependency is resolved..
b. Once
you set the constraint, your schedule will reflect the impact of the set
constraint on the overall project. The project completion date with the impact
of defined constraint is updated. The below figure depicts the new Finish date
to 4 Jun 18.
Figure 4 Project completion date with impact
c. The
impact of the delay in the start of the activity” P2P1010” on the overall
project timelines is shown in the table below: This table have been referred in
the claim to depict the impact analysis of the subject activity.
Sr.#
|
Activity Head
|
Activity ID
|
Start Date
(Baseline 1)
|
Anticipated Start Date
|
Project Finish Date
(Baseline 1)
|
Impact on Project Finish Date
|
Variance
(days)
|
1
|
Application P2P Testing
|
P2P1010
|
19 Mar 18
|
15 May 18
|
6 May 18
|
4 Jun 18
|
29
|
Figure 5 Delay Analysis for the impeded task P2P1010
5. Likewise
the impact of the delay of other activities can be identified as shown in the
below table:
Sr.#
|
Activity Head
|
Activity ID
|
Start Date
(Baseline 1)
|
Anticipated Start Date
|
Project Finish Date
(Baseline 1)
|
Impact on Project Finish Date
|
Variance
(days)
|
1
|
Application P2P Testing
|
P2P1010
|
19 Mar 18
|
15 May 18
|
6 May 18
|
4 Jun 18
|
29
|
2
|
P2P Test of Module B
|
P2P1020
|
26 Mar 18
|
15 May 18
|
6 May 18
|
28 May 18
|
22
|
3
|
Application P2P Testing
|
P2P1030
|
2 Apr 18
|
15 May 18
|
6 May 18
|
21 May 18s
|
15
|
6. To
claim the extension you may refer to the maximum date resulting in the impact analysis
as shown in Figure
10,
it is imperative that the extension of time claim can be set to 4 Jun 18 as
being the maximum date for the project completion.
Comments
Post a Comment